IELTS writing

TOPIC: Some people believe that secondary school children should study international news as a subject. Others say that this is wasting time. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

It is claimed that international news should be added into the curriculums of secondary schools. While some people advocate this, I hold a contrary opinion on this matter.

There are some people who are in favour of making international news a compulsory subject in the curriculum of secondary schools. As the world becomes more open, it would be more necessary than ever before for children to know about what is happening in the world. However, the effectiveness of this practice should be carefully considered because secondary students are often too young to understand news, and they tend to forget the information once the exam is over.

On the other hand, teaching secondary school children about world news would mean that they have less time to learn about core subjects such as Maths and Physics, which are proved to be more important to their education. Furthermore, international news could be soon out of date, even before curriculums are completed. Therefore, news that children learn is actually stale, and this can be viewed as a waste of time.

Of course, I do not imply that teenagers should be isolated from international news. On the contrary, I suggest that secondary school children can access a great source of information through the internet and television, provided that they find it helpful. However, this does not mean that educators should include international news in the school curriculums.

In conclusion, I tend to believe that international news should not be considered to be a subject at the level of secondary education.

(255 words)

TOPIC: People in big cities prefer to live alone or in small family units instead of large family groups. Do you think this is positive or negative trend?

It is true that urban citizens now tend to live individually or in nuclear families. Personally, I believe that this trend has many positive impacts on our lives, and thus should be advocated.

Living alone will give people freedom to do what they want without annoying other family members. In the modern world, the gaps between generations are gradually widening, so it would be a bad idea for several generations to live in the same house. For example, while the young prefer eating fast food for their convenience, their parents and grandparents would like the whole family to have traditional meals together. When it comes to entertaining demands, youngsters are apt to listen to various types of modern music, ranging from pop to rock, which can cause some disturbances to their elder family members.

Furthermore, living in nuclear families offers great benefits to all family members. Firstly, parents have more time to care for the family and thus better raise their children. For example, instead of spending time caring for a large family that is full of potential conflicts between family members, parents can focus on teaching children how to behave properly, or encouraging them to study. Secondly, fewer members means less household expenditure, and this will relieve some financial burdens on working adults. Then, money can be used to spend on better nutrition and facilities which can lead to a higher standard of living.

In conclusion, I firmly hold the view that living individually or in small family units has many benefits for all family members.

(257 words) 

TOPIC: Some people say that government should control tightly the use of freshwater. Other say that individuals should use as much as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

TOPIC: As a part of education, students should spend a period of time living in another country to learn its language and culture. Do you agree or disagree?

Sample:

It is argued that students should experience overseas life to learn the language and culture of the host country. Personally, I would completely agree with this for the following reasons.

To begin with, living in a foreign nation is always advantageous to experience a different culture even for a short period of time. One day abroad is one day learnt. Hence, students living abroad usually have better and more thorough understanding of the outside world than those students who do not have these experiences; they also tend to have more open minds to differences in culture and so become more tolerant to other groups of people. Compared to those who learn the cultural values of foreign countries from books and media, students who have overseas living experience can have a broader perspective of the world we live in.

Furthermore, having first-hand exposure to the local language is the best way to learn it. The truth is, no matter how much students excel in foreign language courses, they do not usually master the language completely. For example, there are never enough English native speakers in schools to provide a real English speaking community, which may result in students knowing English very well in terms of grammar or reading, but speaking and dialogue comprehension is a big obstacle for them. In contrast, living in the foreign environment gradually improves the learner’s accent in speaking and allows them to learn collocations that native speakers normally use in daily conversations.

In conclusion, I firmly hold the view that living in another country for education purposes is advantageous both culture-wise and language-wise.

(267 words)